J. Neiman
Judgment and Decision Making · 2015
A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 1 researcher and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Whom J. Neiman trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
Papers from J. Neiman's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers J. Neiman trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks (Memory & Cognition)
- The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: testing a dual process model. (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)
- In two minds: dual-process accounts of reasoning. (Trends in Cognitive Sciences)
- Psychological Needs and Values Underlying Left-Right Political Orientation: Cross-National Evidence from Eastern and Western Europe
- Man Is by Nature a Political Animal: Evolution, biology, and politics
- What Intelligence Tests Miss: The Psychology of Rational Thought
- Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment.
- Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?-Open Peer Commentary-Gone with the wind: Individual differences in heuristics and biases undermine the implication of
- The Robot's Rebellion: Finding Meaning in the Age of Darwin
- Reflexive and reflective judgment processes: A social cognitive neuroscience approach.