Man Is by Nature a Political Animal: Evolution, biology, and politics
By P. Hatemi, Rose McDermott. 2011
93 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Safety Research, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e4b17e20c804ffcf0744392be25d8cdb3cbb182d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Safety Research
In Social Psychology
In Sociology and Political Science
- Arthur Lupia
- Kevin B. Smith
- John R. Hibbing
- James N. Druckman
- M. Petersen
- Kevin Arceneaux
- Thomas J. Leeper
- Dan Kahan
Citations in the corpus
- Preference Change in Competitive Political Environments (2016, methodology): “With the content just described, our review complements other recent Annual Review articles on similar topics (Bohner & Dickel 2011, Crano & Prislin 2006, DellaVigna & Gentzkow 2010; see also Hatemi & McDermott 2011, Jost & Amodio 2012, Mondak 2010).”
- Evolutionary Political Psychology: On the Origin and Structure of Heuristics and Biases in Politics (2015, background): “To be human is to be a political animal (Hatemi & McDermott, 2011), and to be a political animal is to be equipped with heuristics for political decisionmaking.”
- Reflective liberals and intuitive conservatives: A look at the Cognitive Reflection Test and ideology (2015, background): “Such differences appear to be dispositional and correlate with stable biological traits (Amodio et al., 2007; Kanai et al., 2011; Schreiber 2011).”