B. Englich

General Decision Sciences · 2005–2019

A researcher in the Science corpus: 3 papers; trusts 9 researchers and is trusted by 4 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• General Decision Sciences — 19 citations into it; #1,037 of 1,995 by trust here, #1,429 by citations
• Sociology and Political Science — 18 citations into it; #10,995 of 22,756 by trust here, #14,364 by citations
• Social Psychology — 9 citations into it
• Cognitive Neuroscience — 6 citations into it; #5,344 of 10,852 by trust here, #8,086 by citations
• Applied Psychology — 5 citations into it
• Economics and Econometrics — 5 citations into it
• Safety Research — 5 citations into it

Whom B. Englich trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Thomas Mussweiler
2. Nicholas Epley
3. Gretchen Chapman
4. F. Strack
5. Thomas Gilovich
6. Adam D. Galinsky
7. Norbert Schwarz
8. Jonathan Haidt
9. N. Brewer
10. Eric J. Johnson

Who trusts B. Englich overall

1. Clayton R. Critcher
2. Anthony Heyes
3. Susan A. Bandes
4. Thomas Gilovich
5. Soodeh Saberian

Papers from B. Englich's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers B. Englich trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Comparison processes in social judgment: mechanisms and consequences. (Psychology Review)
2. Putting Adjustment Back in the Anchoring and Adjustment Heuristic: Differential Processing of Self-Generated and Experimenter-Provided Anchors (Psychology Science)
3. Incorporating the Irrelevant: Anchors in Judgments of Belief and Value
4. Overcoming the Inevitable Anchoring Effect: Considering the Opposite Compensates for Selective Accessibility
5. The fragile basic anchoring effect
6. Sources of Mental Contamination: Comparing the Effects of Self-Generated versus Externally Provided Primes☆
7. The Semantics of Anchoring
8. First offers as anchors: the role of perspective-taking and negotiator focus. (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)
9. Considering The Impossible: Explaining The Effects of Implausible Anchors
10. Implications of Attitude Change Theories for Numerical Anchoring: Anchor Plausibility and the Limits of Anchor Effectiveness

Their papers

• Subliminal anchoring: Judgmental consequences and underlying mechanisms (2005) — 157 citations
• Moody experts — How mood and expertise influence judgmental anchoring (2009) — 145 citations
• No Replication, No Trust? How Low Replicability Influences Trust in Psychology (2019) — 97 citations