Subliminal anchoring: Judgmental consequences and underlying mechanisms

By Thomas Mussweiler, B. Englich. 2005

157 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5cf95b366203cee10eccf7909bc1a76314c35d22

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Thomas Gilovich
2. Clayton R. Critcher
3. Kirsten Soder
4. B. Englich

In General Decision Sciences

1. B. Englich
2. Clayton R. Critcher
3. Thomas Gilovich
4. Kirsten Soder

In Sociology and Political Science

1. B. Englich
2. Clayton R. Critcher
3. Thomas Gilovich
4. Kirsten Soder

Citations in the corpus

• Moody experts — How mood and expertise influence judgmental anchoring (2009, background): “Assimilation toward a numerical standard can be elicited even by subliminal standard presentation (Mussweiler & Englich, 2005).”
• Incidental environmental anchors (2008, methodology): “In one demonstration, Mussweiler and Englich (2005) subliminally flashed either high or low numbers to participants while they were thinking about how much the average German car cost.”