M. Borenstein

Statistics and Probability · 2006–2017

A researcher in the Science corpus: 7 papers; trusts 10 researchers and is trusted by 39 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom M. Borenstein trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Julian P. T. Higgins
  2. Ralf Schulze
  3. R. Jorge
  4. L. Hedges
  5. Mark Lipsey
  6. T. A. Wright
  7. R. Riley
  8. J. Deeks
  9. S. Thompson
  10. R. Rosenthal

Who trusts M. Borenstein overall

  1. Mike W.-L. Cheung
  2. Blend Ibrahim
  3. Sung Won Kim
  4. A. Lampit
  5. Chelsea L. Ratcliff
  6. R. Cadario
  7. Vikrant Sihag
  8. Philipp Böhnlein
  9. Guillermo Marcillo
  10. Lifeng Lin

Papers from M. Borenstein's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers M. Borenstein trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Meta-Analysis: A Comparison of Approaches
  2. The power of statistical tests in meta-analysis. (Psychological methods)
  3. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (British medical journal)
  4. Commentary: Heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be expected and appropriately quantified. (International Journal of Epidemiology)
  5. Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
  6. The Moderating Effects of Employee Tenure on the Relation Between Organizational Commitment and Job Performance: A Meta-Analysis
  7. The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis
  8. The power of statistical tests for moderators in meta-analysis. (Psychological methods)
  9. Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses (British medical journal)
  10. The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results

Their papers