Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis: Prevention, Assessment and Adjustments
By H. Rothstein, A. Sutton, M. Borenstein. 2006
1,338 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Statistics and Probability
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- Diversification practices reduce organic to conventional yield gap (2015, methodology): “We also checked for bias in our meta-dataset using a funnel plot and QQ-plot (electronic supplementary material, §S3 [49]).”
- How Big Is “Big”? Interpreting Effect Sizes in L2 Research (2014, background): “There are several sources of publication bias in the social sciences, but the most well documented and well known occurs as the result of the preference among authors, reviewers, and editors to publish only those studies with statistically significant results (Norris & Ortega, 2000; Rothstein et al.”