R. Cadario

Statistics and Probability · 2018

A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 19 researchers and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom R. Cadario trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. W. Viechtbauer
  2. Mike W.-L. Cheung
  3. Andrew Booth
  4. Julian P. T. Higgins
  5. Natalina Zlatevska
  6. David Moher
  7. M. Borenstein
  8. S. Holden
  9. S. Thompson
  10. Chris Dubelaar

Who trusts R. Cadario overall

  1. J. Jachimowicz
  2. Dennis Hummel

Papers from R. Cadario's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers R. Cadario trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (Statistics in Medicine)
  2. Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments (Psychometrika)
  3. Sizing up the Effect of Portion Size on Consumption: A Meta-Analytic Review
  4. Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package
  5. Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (International Coaching Psychology Review)
  6. Effects of the presence of others on food intake: a normative interpretation. (Psychological bulletin)
  7. Controlling the risk of spurious findings from meta‐regression (Statistics in Medicine)
  8. Statistical Methods for Meta‐Analysis
  9. Rejoinder to commentaries on ‘Multivariate meta‐analysis: Potential and promise’
  10. How vague is vague? A simulation study of the impact of the use of vague prior distributions in MCMC using WinBUGS

Their papers