S. Rostosky
Social Psychology · 2000–2017
A researcher in the Science corpus: 14 papers; trusts 15 researchers and is trusted by 13 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Social Psychology — 112 citations into it; #4,300 of 15,694 by trust here, #2,174 by citations
- Sociology and Political Science — 46 citations into it; #8,119 of 22,756 by trust here, #4,616 by citations
- Clinical Psychology — 37 citations into it; #7,727 of 8,024 by trust here, #4,166 by citations
- Gender Studies — 18 citations into it; #1,617 of 4,924 by trust here, #1,289 by citations
- Reproductive Medicine — 16 citations into it; #205 of 208 by trust here, #58 by citations
- General Health Professions — 12 citations into it; #2,296 of 4,781 by trust here, #1,433 by citations
- Education — 7 citations into it
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology — 6 citations into it
Whom S. Rostosky trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
- I. Meyer
- E. Riggle
- L. Kurdek
- John R. Crawford
- P. Bearman
- G. Herek
- Kimberly F. Balsam
- Jonathan J Mohr
- Martin E. P. Seligman
- Julie D. Henry
Who trusts S. Rostosky overall
- E. Riggle
- Jonathan J Mohr
- D. Frost
- S. Horne
- K. Nadal
- Dawn M. Szymanski
- B. R. Ragins
- E. McDermott
- Bonnie Moradi
- M. Brewster
Papers from S. Rostosky's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers S. Rostosky trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- Mental health correlates of perceived discrimination among lesbian, gay, and bisexual adults in the United States. (American Journal of Public Health)
- Measuring Dimensions of Lesbian and Gay Male Experience
- Heterosexuals' attitudes toward bisexual men and women in the United States (Journal of Sex Research)
- Beyond “Homophobia”: Thinking about sexual prejudice and stigma in the twenty-first century
- Character Strengths and Virtues: A Handbook and Classification
- The Psychology of Sexual Prejudice
- Consensual Qualitative Research: An Update
- Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales.
- On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. (Annual Review of Psychology)
- The positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS): construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. (British Journal of Clinical Psychology)
Their papers
- Outness, Concealment, and Authenticity: Associations With LGB Individuals’ Psychological Distress and Well-Being (2017) — 228 citations
- Marriage Amendments and Psychological Distress in Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual (LGB) Adults (2009) — 271 citations
- Out at work: The relation of actor and partner workplace policy and internalized homophobia to disclosure status (2002) — 161 citations
- The Positive Aspects of Being a Lesbian or Gay Man (2008) — 342 citations
- Stress and relationship quality in same-sex couples (2006) — 252 citations
- School Belonging, Self-Esteem, and Depressive Symptoms in Adolescents: An Examination of Sex, Sexual Attraction Status, and Urbanicity (2004) — 191 citations
- The positive aspects of a transgender self-identification (2011) — 177 citations
- Minority stress experiences in committed same-sex couple relationships. (2007) — 165 citations
- Same-sex couple relationship strengths: A review and synthesis of the empirical literature (2000–2016). (2017) — 89 citations
- The positive aspects of intersecting religious/spiritual and LGBTQ identities. (2016) — 88 citations
- A Multifactor Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Positive Identity Measure (LGB-PIM) (2014) — 196 citations
- Development of Heterosexuals into Sexual-Minority Allies: A Qualitative Exploration (2010) — 100 citations
- The Impact of Religiosity on Adolescent Sexual Behavior: (2004) — 382 citations
- A normative perspective of adolescent girls' developing sexuality. (2000) — 92 citations