Out at work: The relation of actor and partner workplace policy and internalized homophobia to disclosure status

By S. Rostosky, E. Riggle. 2002

161 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2d90ff41fa78542357b9bddf42bf4d7c4d1c3da0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. Dawn M. Szymanski
2. Susan Kashubeck‐West
3. Jill Meyer
4. H. Levitt
5. Jae A. Puckett
6. E. McDermott
7. S. Horne
8. S. Rostosky

In Social Psychology

1. Dawn M. Szymanski
2. Susan Kashubeck‐West
3. H. Levitt
4. Jae A. Puckett
5. Jill Meyer
6. Jonathan J Mohr
7. S. Rostosky
8. E. Riggle

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Dawn M. Szymanski
2. Susan Kashubeck‐West
3. Christine Daly
4. Jill Meyer
5. H. Levitt
6. Jae A. Puckett
7. Jonathan J Mohr
8. E. Riggle

Citations in the corpus

• Internalized Stigma Within Sexual and Gender Minorities: Change Strategies and Clinical Implications (2015, background): “…(Fingerhut, Peplau, & Ghavami, 2005; Peterson & Gerrity, 2006; Szymanski, Chung, & Balsam, 2001), being associated with earlier stages of sexual minority identity development, as well as lower levels of outness (Herek, Gillis, & Cogan, 2009; Rostosky & Riggle, 2002; Szymanski et al., 2001).”
• The Best of Times, the Worst of Times (2008, unknown): “From the perspective of gay employees, the positivity of disclosure experiences may be more strongly related to supportiveness of their organization (e.g., Ragins & Cornwell, 2001; Rostosky & Riggle, 2002) than the particular conditions of their disclosure.”
• Stress and relationship quality in same-sex couples (2006, background): “Past research on GLB samples indicates moderately high level of internal consistency and test/retest reliability (Rostosky & Riggle, 2002; Wright et al., 1999; Wright & Perry, 2002) and demonstrated acceptable reliability for the current sample (Cronbach’s alpha = 76).”
• Sexual minority stress and changes in relationship quality in same-sex couples (2008, background): “Furthermore, studies indicate that partners’ levels of internalized homonegativity are correlated (Mohr & Fassinger, 2006; Rostosky & Riggle, 2002), suggesting that homonegativity is a characteristic of not only individuals but also couples.”
• Surviving in Dangerous Places: Lesbian Identity Performances in the Workplace, Social Class and Psychological Health (2006, background): “Employer policies, perceived employer supportiveness and self-acceptance have all been found to be associated with sexual identity ‘disclosing’ behaviours at work (Chrobot-Mason et al., 2001; Griffith and Hebl, 2002; Ragins and Cornwell, 2001; Rostosky and Riggle, 2002).”
• Internalized Homophobia and Relationship Quality among Lesbians, Gay Men, and Bisexuals (2009, unknown): “Rostosky and Riggle (2002) demonstrated that coming out at work is a function not only of individuals' levels of internalized homophobia, but also their perceiving a safe and nondiscriminatory work environment.”
• Marriage Amendments and Psychological Distress in Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual (LGB) Adults (2009, background): “Additional support for the construct validity of this measure can be found in Riggle, Rostosky, Prather, and Hamrin (2005) and Rostosky and Riggle (2002) .”
• Workplace contextual supports for LGBT employees: A review, meta‐analysis, and agenda for future research (2018, background): “For policies and practices, most studies use signaling theory to justify the relationships between LGBT supportive policy and practices and outcomes (e.g., Day & Schoenrade, 2000; Law et al., 2011; Rostosky & Riggle, 2002).”
• Voice, silence, and diversity in 21st century organizations: strategies for inclusion of gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender employees (2011, background): “…is sometimes used strategically (see Creed, 2003), but, as we will discuss, concealment comes with a host of negative consequences for both individuals and the organizations that employ them (Beatty & Kirby, 2006; Day & Schoenrade, 1997; Ragins & Cornwell, 2001; Rostosky & Riggle, 2002).”
• Making the invisible visible: fear and disclosure of sexual orientation at work. (2007, unknown): “…modified from the “out at work” measure used by Croteau and Lark (1995), Levine and Leonard (1984), and Schneider (1987), and they were very similar to the degree of disclosure item used in other studies (cf. Driscoll et al., 1996; Rostosky & Riggle, 2002; N. G. Smith & Ingram, 2004; Waldo, 1999).”
• Internalized Heterosexism (2008, background): “…& Krowinski, 2003; McDermott, Tyndall, & Lichtenberg, 1989; McGregor et al., 2001; Nungesser, 1983; Radonsky & Borders, 1995; Ross & Rosser, 1996; Rostosky & Riggle, 2002; Voisard, 1995; Welch, 1998; Zuckerman, 1998) examining the link between IH and various aspects of self-disclosure of one’s…”
• Models of Workplace Sexual Identity Disclosure and Management (2008, background): “This notion is generally supported by empirical literature that links a strong positive LGB identity, in the sense of identification with the social group, to more openness about that identity (Button, 2001; Chrobot-Mason et al., 2001; Griffith & Hebl, 2002; Rotosky & Riggle, 2002; Ragins, 2004).”