P. Gleason

Education · 2002–2013

A researcher in the Science corpus: 6 papers; trusts 7 researchers and is trusted by 5 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom P. Gleason trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Guido W. Imbens
  2. Joshua D. Angrist
  3. Donald B. Rubin
  4. C. Hill
  5. David S. Lee
  6. Christopher Zorn
  7. Mark Lipsey
  8. Peter Z. Schochet
  9. Howard S. Bloom
  10. W. Shadish

Who trusts P. Gleason overall

  1. Helen F. Ladd
  2. Kenneth Fortson
  3. Josh Angrist
  4. Alex J. Bowers
  5. Christopher R. Walters
  6. Natalya Verbitsky-Savitz
  7. Roland G. Fryer

Papers from P. Gleason's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers P. Gleason trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects
  2. Identification of Causal effects Using Instrumental Variables
  3. Is regression adjustment supported by the Neyman model for causal inference
  4. Teachers, Schools, and Academic Achievement
  5. Teachers and Student Achievement in the Chicago Public High Schools (Journal of Labor Economics)
  6. Three conditions under which experiments and observational studies produce comparable causal estimates: New findings from within‐study comparisons
  7. Nonexperimental Versus Experimental Estimates of Earnings Impacts
  8. Causal effects in clinical and epidemiological studies via potential outcomes: concepts and analytical approaches. (Annual Review of Public Health)
  9. Does Student Sorting Invalidate Value-Added Models of Teacher Effectiveness? An Extended Analysis of the Rothstein Critique (Education Finance and Policy)
  10. Can Nonrandomized Experiments Yield Accurate Answers? A Randomized Experiment Comparing Random and Nonrandom Assignments

Their papers