The Evaluation of Charter School Impacts: Final Report. NCEE 2010-4029.
By P. Gleason, M. Clark, C. Tuttle, Emily Dwoyer. 2010
261 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f5748631efeceaeeaec64208d26e193dbf10d2b6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Christopher R. Walters
- Parag A. Pathak
- Josh Angrist
- Atila Abdulkadiroglu
- Joshua D. Angrist
- Onur Kesten
- Tayfun Sönmez
- M. Utku Ünver
Citations in the corpus
- The Demand for Effective Charter Schools (2018, unknown): “Hoxby and Rockoff (2004), Hoxby and Murarka (2009), Gleason et al. (2010), Angrist et al. (2012, 2013, 2016), and Dobbie and Fryer (2013, 2015) also report positive effects of urban charter schools.”
- Explaining Charter School Effectiveness (2013, background): “These results echo findings from a multi-state study of 36 charter middle schools using admissions lotteries (Gleason et al., 2010).”
- The Medium-Term Impacts of High-Achieving Charter Schools (2015, unknown): “Education is the best provision for old age. ðAristotleÞ I. Introduction The typical charter school is no more effective at increasing test scores than the typical traditional public school ðGleason et al. 2010Þ.”