J. Meerpohl
Statistics and Probability · 2011–2020
A researcher in the Science corpus: 18 papers; trusts 7 researchers and is trusted by 4 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Statistics and Probability — 71 citations into it; #8,669 of 12,932 by trust here, #159 by citations
- Economics and Econometrics — 45 citations into it; #15,046 of 23,481 by trust here, #432 by citations
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health — 38 citations into it; #1,362 of 2,368 by trust here, #33 by citations
Whom J. Meerpohl trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
Who trusts J. Meerpohl overall
Papers from J. Meerpohl's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers J. Meerpohl trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. (Journal of Clinical Epidemiology)
- GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. (Journal of Clinical Epidemiology)
- Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study (British medical journal)
- Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy. (New England Journal of Medicine)
- Grey literature in meta-analyses of randomized trials of health care interventions. (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews)
- External validity of randomised controlled trials: "to whom do the results of this trial apply?".
- When are randomised trials unnecessary? Picking signal from noise (British medical journal)
- Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews)
- The safety of statins in clinical practice. (The Lancet)
- Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results. (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews)
Their papers
- GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. (2011) — 9,069 citations
- GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence--publication bias. (2011) — 1,582 citations
- GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence--indirectness. (2011) — 1,166 citations
- GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence--study limitations (risk of bias). (2011) — 2,570 citations
- [GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence - indirectness]. (2012) — 639 citations
- GRADE guidelines: 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes. (2013) — 683 citations
- GRADE guidelines: 12. Preparing summary of findings tables-binary outcomes. (2013) — 694 citations
- GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. (2011) — 7,351 citations
- GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence--imprecision. (2011) — 2,352 citations
- [GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence - inconsistency]. (2012) — 767 citations
- GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations. (2013) — 1,344 citations
- [GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction - GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables]. (2012) — 739 citations
- GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendation-determinants of a recommendation's direction and strength. (2013) — 862 citations
- GRADE guidelines: 13. Preparing summary of findings tables and evidence profiles-continuous outcomes. (2013) — 641 citations
- GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence. (2011) — 1,187 citations
- Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) notes: extremely serious, GRADE's terminology for rating down by three levels (2020) — 101 citations
- GRADE guidelines 26: Informative statements to communicate the findings of systematic reviews of interventions. (2019) — 898 citations
- Effect of lower sodium intake on health: systematic review and meta-analyses (2013) — 1,226 citations