[GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction - GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables].

By G. Langer, J. Meerpohl, M. Perleth, G. Gartlehner, A. Kaminski-Hartenthaler, Holger J. Schünemann. Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen, 2012

739 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ccaa7ef9cb0bc56a15dfd0ebf768f6638adad82e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Holger J. Schünemann
2. G. Guyatt
3. J. Brożek
4. J. Meerpohl
5. Andrew D. Oxman
6. M. Samuel
7. P. Moja
8. Harry van Goor

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

1. Holger J. Schünemann
2. G. Guyatt
3. J. Brożek
4. Andrew D. Oxman
5. J. Meerpohl
6. G. Vist
7. M. Samuel
8. Harry van Goor

In Statistics and Probability

1. Holger J. Schünemann
2. G. Guyatt
3. J. Brożek
4. J. Meerpohl
5. Andrew D. Oxman
6. G. Vist
7. Regina Kunz
8. Mark Helfand

Citations in the corpus

• GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. (2011, methodology): “In the two previous articles in this series, we introduced GRADE; provided an overview of the GRADE process for developing recommendations and the final outputs of that process, the evidence profile, and Summary of Findings table; and described the process for framing questions and identifying outco”
• The management of antithrombotic agents for patients undergoing GI endoscopy. (2016, methodology): “The recommendations were based on reviewed studies and were graded on the strength of the supporting evidence (Table 1).(1) This guideline is intended to be an educational device to provide information that may assist endoscopists in providing care to patients.”