K. Reiling

2000–2002

A researcher in the Science corpus: 2 papers; trusts 2 researchers and is trusted by 17 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Whom K. Reiling trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. S. Merry
  2. Paul Orsmond

Who trusts K. Reiling overall

  1. D. Carless
  2. Nigel K. L. Pope
  3. Maddalena Taras
  4. Sarah Gielen
  5. Yuh-Mei Chen
  6. Paul Orsmond

Papers from K. Reiling's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers K. Reiling trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. The Implementation of Peer Assessment: An action research approach
  2. The Use of Student Derived Marking Criteria in Peer and Self-assessment
  3. Feedback on learning achievement: rhetoric and reality
  4. Written Feedback for Students: too much, too detailed or too incomprehensible to be effective?
  5. Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice
  6. Formative assessment in higher education: Moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice
  7. Effectiveness of feedback: the students’ perspective
  8. Is it worth the effort? How feedback influences students’ subsequent submission of assessable work
  9. A socio‐cultural theorisation of formative assessment
  10. Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors’ written responses

Their papers