K. Swartz

Clinical Psychology · 2009

A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 2 researchers and is trusted by 1 researcher here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Clinical Psychology — 13 citations into it; #6,652 of 8,024 by trust here, #6,260 by citations
• Sociology and Political Science — 11 citations into it; #19,702 of 22,756 by trust here, #16,952 by citations

Whom K. Swartz trusts

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Edward J. Latessa (in Sociology and Political Science)
2. Christopher T. Lowenkamp (in Sociology and Political Science)

Who trusts K. Swartz

1. F. Cullen (in Sociology and Political Science)

Papers from K. Swartz's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers K. Swartz trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. DOES CORRECTIONAL PROGRAM QUALITY REALLY MATTER? THE IMPACT OF ADHERING TO THE PRINCIPLES OF EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION*
2. Can 14,737 women be wrong? A meta‐analysis of the LSI‐R and recidivism for female offenders*
3. INCREASING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CORRECTIONAL PROGRAMMING THROUGH THE RISK PRINCIPLE: IDENTIFYING OFFENDERS FOR RESIDENTIAL PLACEMENT*
4. Classification for Effective Rehabilitation
5. The Effectiveness of Correctional Rehabilitation: A Review of Systematic Reviews
6. Changes in Criminal Thinking and Identity in Novice and Experienced Inmates
7. The Accuracy of Five Risk Appraisal Instruments in Predicting Institutional Misconduct and New Convictions
8. The Primary Factors that Characterize Effective Interventions with Juvenile Offenders: A Meta-Analytic Overview
9. Effective correctional treatment and violent reoffending: A meta-analysis
10. Twenty years of operational use of a risk prediction instrument: The United States parole commission's salient factor score

Their papers

• Validating the Principles of Effective Intervention: A Systematic Review of the Contributions of Meta-Analysis in the Field of Corrections (2009) — 226 citations