Classification for Effective Rehabilitation

By Demetra Andrews, J. Bonta, R. Hoge. 1990

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Interventions over Predictions: Reframing the Ethical Debate for Actuarial Risk Assessment (2017, background): “Risk assessments were reframed as a way of effectively identifying and allotting scarce resources to programs and interventions that were “proven” to work (Andrews and Bonta, 2010; Andrews et al., 1990; Cullen and Genderau, 2001; Etienne, 2009),”
Psychopathy versus psychopathies in classifying criminal offenders (2005, background): “In order to address this variability, many distinct approaches to classifying offenders into more homogeneous groups have been proposed ( Andrews, Bonta, & Hoge, 1990; Clements, 1996; Megargee & Bohn, 1979; Nagin, Farrington, & Moffitt, 1995).”
Predicting the Prison Misconducts of Women Offenders (2007, background): “More recently, researchers have found that certain needs are also predictive of recidivism (Andrews et al., 1990).”
Community-oriented policing to reduce crime, disorder and fear and increase satisfaction and legitimacy among citizens: a systematic review (2014, background): “, Andrews et al. 1990; Lowenkamp et al. 2006; Lum et al. 2011; Weisburd and Eck 2004). Community-oriented policing, as it is done in practice, clearly faces a number of definitional and implementation challenges. As Weisburd and Eck (2004) note, it is surprising that there has been so little systema”
An Assessment for Criminal Thinking (2006, background): “According to Andrews, Bonta, and Hoge (1990), the most intensive treatment services and correctional supervision should be reserved for those offenders who are most likely to reoffend, and effective classification of these individuals needs to include an assessment of risks and needs (particularly…”
What Have We Learned from Five Decades of Neutralization Research? (2005, background): “…the ubiquity of cognitive-based treatment in correctional programming, cognitive-level research rarely appears in mainstream U.S. criminology (see Andrews, Bonta, and Hoge 1990; Foglia 2000, pp. 10-11).12 1 Neutralization theory is cited in the most thorough reviews of cognitive-behavior therapy…”