Validating the Principles of Effective Intervention: A Systematic Review of the Contributions of Meta-Analysis in the Field of Corrections

By P. Smith, P. Gendreau, K. Swartz. 2009

226 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a473bb700d77ccbac1eeb574a2cc9a2169dfe703

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Psychiatry and Mental health

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

The Risk Need Responsivity Model of Offender Rehabilitation: Is There Really a Need for a Paradigm Shift?. (2013, background): “In terms of case studies intended to demonstrate the effectiveness of the GLM, Whitehead, Ward, and Collie (2007) describe the case of Mr.”
An Experimental Evaluation of the Impact of Intensive Supervision on the Recidivism of High-Risk Probationers (2017, background): “Several recent meta-analyses have shown, across multiple treatment and intervention types, that the integration of a therapeutic component into supervision can have a positive impact on offending rates (Cullen, Wright, & Applegate, 1996; Dowden & Andrews, 2000; Lipsey & Landenberger, 2005; Smith et ”
Rehabilitation: Beyond Nothing Works (2013, background): “Again, this appears to be the case (Gendreau, Smith, and French 2006; Smith, Gendreau, and Swartz 2009; Andrews and Bonta 2010; Smith 2013).”
Evaluating the Long-Term Effects of Prisoner Reentry Services on Recidivism: What Types of Services Matter? (2016, result): “This principle has been examined through meta-analysis and results support the principle, although Smith, Gendreau, and Swartz (2009) acknowledge that the studies conducted on this topic are not extensive and the range of mean effect sizes is large.”
Never too late (2010, background): “There is some evidence that these programs are especially effective for high-risk juveniles, disputing the claim that serious, violent offenders are beyond redemption (Andrews and Bonta, 2006; Smith et al., 2009).”