C. Hartmann

Food Science · 2013–2021

A researcher in the Science corpus: 11 papers; trusts 7 researchers and is trusted by 11 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Food Science — 62 citations into it; #1,467 of 1,700 by trust here, #811 by citations
• Social Psychology — 54 citations into it; #6,843 of 15,694 by trust here, #3,781 by citations
• Insect Science — 32 citations into it; #420 of 2,259 by trust here, #440 by citations
• Sensory Systems — 29 citations into it; #188 of 760 by trust here, #123 by citations
• Cognitive Neuroscience — 26 citations into it
• Ecology — 24 citations into it; #9,668 of 10,717 by trust here, #8,179 by citations
• Marketing — 24 citations into it
• Nutrition and Dietetics — 20 citations into it; #804 of 1,029 by trust here, #677 by citations

Whom C. Hartmann trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Wim Verbeke
2. Michael Siegrist
3. M. Ruby
4. P. Rozin
5. J. Graça
6. Hank Rothgerber
7. Paul Slovic

Who trusts C. Hartmann overall

1. G. Sogari
2. Diana Bogueva
3. Marleen C. Onwezen
4. Dora Vasileva Marinova
5. Michael Siegrist
6. Ryan Ardoin
7. N. Jensen
8. S. Giordano
9. H. Dagevos
10. Florian Fiebelkorn

Papers from C. Hartmann's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers C. Hartmann trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Perception of risk.
2. Anthropo‐entomophagy: Cultures, evolution and sustainability
3. Edible insects: future prospects for food and feed security
4. MEN, MEAT, AND MARRIAGE: MODELS OF MASCULINITY
5. Consumer attitudes and purchase intentions in relation to organic foods in Taiwan: Moderating effects of food-related personality traits
6. Meat Is Good to Taboo: Dietary Proscriptions as a Product of the Interaction of Psychological Mechanisms and Social Processes
7. The Disgust Scale: item analysis, factor structure, and suggestions for refinement. (Psychological Assessment)
8. Vegetarianism. A blossoming field of study. (Appetite)
9. Eating ‘Green’: Motivations behind organic food consumption in Australia
10. Exploring the gap between attitudes and behaviour: understanding why consumers buy or do not buy organic food

Their papers

• The psychology of eating insects: A cross-cultural comparison between Germany and China (2015) — 555 citations
• A multi-national comparison of meat eaters' attitudes and expectations for burgers containing beef, pea or algae protein (2021) — 118 citations
• Our daily meat: Justification, moral evaluation and willingness to substitute (2020) — 110 citations
• Consumer responses to novel and unfamiliar foods (2020) — 329 citations
• Consumer acceptance of novel food technologies (2020) — 630 citations
• Development and validation of the Food Disgust Scale (2018) — 189 citations
• Brave, health-conscious, and environmentally friendly: Positive impressions of insect food product consumers (2018) — 93 citations
• Effects of the degree of processing of insect ingredients in snacks on expected emotional experiences and willingness to eat (2016) — 208 citations
• Becoming an Insectivore: Results of an Experiment (2016) — 230 citations
• Factors influencing changes in sustainability perception of various food behaviors: Results of a longitudinal study (2015) — 138 citations
• Antecedents of food neophobia and its association with eating behavior and food choices (2013) — 274 citations