The psychology of eating insects: A cross-cultural comparison between Germany and China

By C. Hartmann, Jing Shi, A. Giusto, Michael Siegrist. 2015

555 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A Systematic Review on Consumer Acceptance of Alternative Proteins: Pulses, Algae, Insects, Plant-based Meat Alternatives, and Cultured Meat. (2020, background): “…consumption of insects not only increases 305 consumption but also positively impacts wider associations, such as perceptions of tastiness of 306 insects (Megido et al., 2016; Cicatiello et al., 2016; Hartmann et al., 2015; Schlup & Brunner, 307 2018; Tan et al., 2015; 2016a; 2016b; Verbeke, 2015).”
Factors determining neophobia and neophilia with regard to new technologies applied to the food sector: A systematic review (2017, background): “…intentions (Baker et al., 2016); this review focuses on major studies, including a cross-cultural comparison between German and Chinese consumers (Hartmann et al., 2015) and other investigations into the attitudes of western consumers (Caparros Megido et al., 2013; Ali, 2016; Verbeke, 2015; Tan…”
Willingness to pay for insect-based food: The role of information and carrier (2019, background): “In the same vein, it has been demonstrated that the mode of preparation strongly influences the expectation of products, especially in the case of unfamiliar products such as insect-based products (Caparros Megido et al., 2014; Hartmann et al., 2015; Tan et al., 2015).”