Becoming an Insectivore: Results of an Experiment

By C. Hartmann, Michael Siegrist. 2016

230 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Insect Science, Sensory Systems, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d3f3ffd12cdb4b320f45eb7907d4b7983a038447

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Insect Science

1. Diana Bogueva
2. Dora Vasileva Marinova
3. G. Sogari

In Sensory Systems

1. Diana Bogueva
2. Dora Vasileva Marinova
3. G. Sogari

In Social Psychology

1. Diana Bogueva
2. Dora Vasileva Marinova
3. G. Sogari

Citations in the corpus

• Factors determining neophobia and neophilia with regard to new technologies applied to the food sector: A systematic review (2017, background): “…products when they were presented as ingredients of more generally accepted processed foods (e.g. cookies or drinks) rather than unprocessed (Hartmann and Siegrist, 2016; Ali, 2016), while eastern (above all Chinese) consumers revealed little difference in terms of their acceptance based on…”
• Australian Consumers’ Response to Insects as Food (2019, methodology): “Since then, there has been a growing number of studies worldwide that have used sensory testing (e.g., check-all-that apply test, hedonic test, and other techniques) to investigate consumers’ acceptance and organoleptic parameters of edible insects as food (e.g., Tenebrio Molitor and house cricket i”