Edward T. Cokely
General Decision Sciences · 2007–2014
A researcher in the Science corpus: 6 papers; trusts 25 researchers and is trusted by 6 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- General Decision Sciences — 43 citations into it; #739 of 1,995 by trust here, #1,028 by citations
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology — 27 citations into it
- Applied Psychology — 24 citations into it
- Cognitive Neuroscience — 23 citations into it; #3,550 of 10,852 by trust here, #5,677 by citations
- Developmental and Educational Psychology — 14 citations into it
- Statistics and Probability — 14 citations into it
- Artificial Intelligence — 12 citations into it; #16,162 of 35,345 by trust here, #20,377 by citations
- Clinical Psychology — 12 citations into it
Whom Edward T. Cokely trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
- Joshua Knobe
- Ellen Peters
- John R. Anderson
- K. Stanovich
- Gerd Gigerenzer
- Isaac Lipkus
- J. Raven
- Daniel Kahneman
- E. Brandstätter
- F. Del Missier
Who trusts Edward T. Cokely overall
- Adam Feltz
- Saima Ghazal
- Chris Zarpentine
- K. Stanovich
- Dimitra Gkatzia
- F. Del Missier
- R. García‐Retamero
- Ellen Peters
- N. Horstmann
- Guillermo Campitelli
Papers from Edward T. Cokely's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers Edward T. Cokely trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice.
- A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. (American Psychologist)
- Risk Perception and Affect
- Cognitive abilities and superior decision making under risk: A protocol analysis and process model evaluation (Judgment and Decision Making)
- Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?-Open Peer Commentary-Gone with the wind: Individual differences in heuristics and biases undermine the implication of
- Intentional action in folk psychology: An experimental investigation
- Intentional Action and Side Effects in Ordinary Language
- Intention, intentional action and moral considerations
- How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making.
- Maximizing versus satisficing: happiness is a matter of choice. (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)
Their papers
- Measuring Risk Literacy: The Berlin Numeracy Test (2012) — 688 citations
- Individual differences, judgment biases, and theory-of-mind: Deconstructing the intentional action side effect asymmetry (2009) — 94 citations
- Predicting biases in very highly educated samples: Numeracy and metacognition (2014) — 159 citations
- Individual Differences in Graph Literacy: Overcoming Denominator Neglect in Risk Comprehension (2012) — 134 citations
- Cognitive abilities and superior decision making under risk: A protocol analysis and process model evaluation (2009) — 452 citations
- The making of an expert. (2007) — 736 citations