Individual differences, judgment biases, and theory-of-mind: Deconstructing the intentional action side effect asymmetry

94 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Cognitive abilities and superior decision making under risk: A protocol analysis and process model evaluation (2009, background): “…that individual differences cannot be ignored by judgment and decision researchers as majority choice does not necessarily reflect a single decision process that can be accurately assessed or modeled at the level of group means (Cokely & Feltz, 2009; Feltz & Cokely, 2008; Regenwetter et al, 2008).”
Do you know more when it matters less? (2010, background): “…by philosophers have been tested empirically by ‘‘experimental philosophers’’ across a wide variety of sub-fields including intentional action (e.g., Cokely & Feltz, 2009; Knobe, 2006), free will and moral responsibility (e.g., Feltz & Cokely, 2009; Feltz, Cokely, & Nadelhoffer, 2009; Nahmias,…”