Intentional Action and Side Effects in Ordinary Language
By Joshua Knobe. 2003
942 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Philosophy
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Liane L. Young
- Fiery Cushman
- Joshua Knobe
- Wesley Buckwalter
- Adam Waytz
- Adam Feltz
- Tania Lombrozo
- Edouard Machery
In Philosophy
- Joshua Knobe
- Hugh Mccann
- Edouard Machery
- Tania Lombrozo
- Wesley Buckwalter
- Tim Miller
- Thomas Nadelhoffer
- Max Deutsch
Citations in the corpus
- Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciences (2017, background): “Knobe’s vignette from his seminal [88] paper is:”
- Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings (2018, methodology): “CULTURAL VARIATION IN CORRESPONDENCE BIAS: THE CRITICAL ROLE OF ATTITUDE DIAGNOSTICITY OF SOCIALLY CONSTRAINED BEHAVIOR (Miyamoto & Kitayama, 2002, Study 1) Miyamoto and Kitayama (2002) examined whether Americans would be more likely than Japanese to show a bias toward ascribing to an actor an attit”
- Gender and Philosophical Intuition (2010, background): “Intrigued by some of the findings we have been recounting, Buckwalter decided to reanalyze the data he and James Beebe had collected, which had demonstrated a surprising extension of the side-effect effect discovered by Joshua Knobe (Beebe and Buckwalter, forthcoming). While Knobe’s original studies”
- Surveying Freedom: Folk Intuitions about free will and moral responsibility (2005, background): “[3] See, for example, Adams and Steadman (2004), Doris and Stich (forthcoming), Knobe (2003a, 2003b, 2004), Mele (2003), Nadelhoffer (2004, 2005), Nahmias, Morris, Nadelhoffer, and Turner (forthcoming), Nichols (2004), Nichols, Weinburg, and Stich (2003), Weinburg, Nichols, and Stich (2001),…”
- Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy (2018, background): “…or the content of the stimuli and testing whether this change affects participants’ responses (e.g., changing the side effect of an action from ‘harming the environment’ to ‘helping the environment’ and seeing how this affects participants’ judgments of an agent’s intention, as in Knobe, 2003a).”
- The Concept of Intentional Action: A Case Study in the Uses of Folk Psychology (2006, background): “subjects in a controlled experiment ( Knobe 2003a ).”
- The folk concepts of intention and intentional action: A cross-cultural study (2006, background): “(So, for example, people blame the chairman for harming the environment but do not praise the chairman for helping the environment; Knobe 2003.)”
- Intention, intentional action and moral considerations (2004, background): “Each subject was randomly assigned either to the ‘harm condition’ 2 These vignettes are presented in Knobe 2003: 191 and quoted in Adams and Steadman 2004. or to the ‘help condition.’”
- The Folk Concept of Intentional Action: Philosophical and Experimental Issues (2008, background): “Consider, particularly, ' the harm case ' and ' the help case ' ( Knobe, 2003 ).”
- The Pervasive Impact of Moral Judgment (2009, background): “' Experimental studies concerning intuitions about cases like these consistently show a striking asymmetry (Feltz and Cokely 2007; Knobe 2003; Mallon 2008; Nichols and Ulatowski 2007; Phelan and Sarkissian forthcoming).”
- Including Deontic Reasoning as Fundamental to Theory of Mind (2008, background): “In adults, recent research has shown important influences of moral factors on mental-intentional judgments [Knobe, 2003, 2004].”
- Telling More Than We Can Know About Intentional Action (2011, neutral): “© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd influence judgments of intentionality (Doris et al., 2007; Knobe, 2003, 2005, 2006; Mele, 2006; Nadelhoffer, 2004a and b, 2006; Alicke, 2008; Wright and Bengson, 2009; Holton, 2010).”
- Intentional Action and Intending: Recent Empirical Studies (2005, methodology): “Finally, I am especially thankful to Joshua Knobe, first for prompting me to think about these matters again, but much more for his patient assistance with the design and interpretation of the experiments described herein.”
- Intentional action in ordinary language: core concept or pragmatic understanding? (2004, background): “8 Mele (2001: 40) makes a similar sort of suggestion, which Knobe (2003b) pursues.”