The Psychology of Criminal Conduct.
By Terri Gullickson. 1995
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Alex R. Piquero
- Demetra Andrews
- F. Cullen
- Michael T. Baglivio
- Tony Ward
- R. Serin
- Dan Nagin
- S. Wormith
Citations in the corpus
- Interventions over Predictions: Reframing the Ethical Debate for Actuarial Risk Assessment (2017, background): “to work [1, 2, 14, 23], To this end, a third generation of actuarial tools integrated factors that were conceived as “criminogenic needs,” or intervenable factors that are believed to impact one’s risk of recidivating.”
- The Risk-Need-Responsivity (RNR) Model (2011, background): “We have been making this point for years (Andrews, 1980; Andrews & Bonta, 1994; Andrews & Dowden, 2007; Wormith, 1984).”
- An Intensive Supervision Program That Worked: Service Delivery, Professional Orientation, and Organizational Supportiveness (2005, background): “This literature has clearly demonstrated that low-risk offenders have been the least likely to benefit from correctional interventions; rather, it is higher risk offenders that have the most to gain from intensive interventions (Andrews & Bonta, 2003; Gendreau, 1996).”
- The Organized/Disorganized Typology of Serial Murder: Myth or Model? (2004, background): “As Blackburn (1993) discusses, all these typologies of serial violent crime remain at the level of hypotheses and thorough empirical validation has yet to be undertaken. Of all the typologies available the organized/disorganized dichotomy does remain the most influential, often being drawn upon by a”
- Identities Through Time: An Exploration of Identity Change as a Cause of Desistance (2016, background): “Research has shown that cognitive behavioral therapy is among the most effective in reducing recidivism (Andrews & Bonta, 2010; Landenberger & Lipsey, 2005).”
- Examining the Validity of a Juvenile Offending Risk Assessment Instrument Across Gender and Race/Ethnicity (2013, background): “Risk assessments have often been grouped into four generations (Andrews & Bonta, 2003).”
- Motivational interviewing with offenders: A systematic review (2009, methodology): “Needs–Responsivity (R-N-R) model of offender assessment and treatment (Andrews & Bonta, 2003).”
- Cognitive Approaches to the Assessment of Sexual Interest in Sexual Offenders (2009, background): “addressing this crucial point, Andrews and Bonta (1994) have formulated the need principle: Many offenders, especially high-risk offenders, have a variety of needs.”
- The Risk-Need-Responsivity Model of Assessment and Human Service in Prevention and Corrections: Crime-Prevention Jurisprudence (2007, background): “a Principle added or significantly augmented since Andrews et al. (1990). See Andrews (2001) for full statement of the principles.”
- Reducing Gang Violence Using Focused Deterrence: Evaluating the Cincinnati Initiative to Reduce Violence (CIRV) (2013, background): “In 2009, the team was restructured to deliver services that were believed to be more effective in reducing future criminal behavior by addressing four basic principles for effective intervention: risk, need, responsivity, and fidelity (Andrews & Bonta, 2003; Gendreau, 1996).”
- Imprisonment and Reoffending (2009, background): “…sanctions, including imprisonment, have little effect on recidivism or are criminogenic (Andrews et al. 1990; Gendreau, Goggin, and Cullen 1999; Andrews and Bonta 2006; Gendreau, Smith, and French 2006; Smith 2006; Smith, Gendreau, and Swartz 2009; see also MacKenzie 2006; Lipsey and Cullen…”
- Readiness for treatment in high risk offenders with personality disorders (2007, methodology): “Programme readiness, as we describe it, is akin to the phenomenon of responsivity within the Risk/Needs/ Responsivity model of Andrews and Bonta (2003).”
- Reconstructing the Risk-Need-Responsivity model: A theoretical elaboration and evaluation (2007, unknown): “The following two paragraphs capture nicely what Andrews and Bonta (2003) mean by a psychological approach to the explanation and modification of criminal conduct: As a science, the psychology of criminal conduct is an approach to understanding the criminal behavior of individuals through (a) the…”
- Treatment of Psychopathy: A Review of Empirical Findings. (2006, methodology): “Andrews and Bonta (1994), Brown and Gutsch (1985), Serin and Kurychik (1994), and Wong and Hare (2005) all suggested that intensive cognitivebehavioral programs targeting “criminogenic needs” (i.e., personal characteristics correlated with recidivism) might be effective. For example, Wong and Hare r”