The psychology of criminal conduct, 5th ed.

By Demetra Andrews, J. Bonta. 2010

2,283 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dccd5e3dc06dbb620e6e3cdc252d29af45b6980c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

The Interrelatedness of Adverse Childhood Experiences Among High-Risk Juvenile Offenders (2016, methodology): “The C-PACT domains are reflective of the ‘‘Central Eight’’ risk factors espoused by Andrews and Bonta (2003).”
A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of young offender treatment programs in Europe (2013, methodology): “The studies were also coded according to two three-level items: the first indicated the degree to which treatments were designed to address specific criminogenic needs, as established in the rehabilitation program literature (Andrews and Bonta 2010; Hollin 2002), and the second item measured adheren”
Handbook of violence risk assessment. (2010, methodology): “It was developed based on two well-validated models of offender management: the Personal, Interpersonal, Community-Reinforcement perspective and the Risk-Need-Responsivity framework ( Andrews & Bonta, 2010 ).”
The Predictive Validity of a Gender-Responsive Needs Assessment (2009, methodology): “Additionally, it has been argued that the “big four” risk factors (i.e., antisocial attitudes, peers, personality, and criminal history) are the strongest predictors of recidivism and therefore should be the primary focus of most correctional programs (Andrews & Bonta, 2003).”
Implementing Trauma-Informed Care in Correctional Treatment and Supervision (2018, background): “Correctional programs for criminality work best when they target specific risk factors and individual needs for each client, tailored in a way that best engages the client to benefit from the intervention (Andrews & Bonta, 2010, 2017; Miller, 2011).”
Sources of Variability in Estimates of Predictive Validity (2011, methodology): “The level of detailed inquiry that is necessary for such an investigation of LS is pursued elsewhere (Andrews et al., in press; Andrews & Bonta, 2010; Rettinger & Andrews, 2010).”
Measuring Group Climate in Prison (2011, unknown): “The RNR principle holds that the intensity of the behavioral intervention matches the risk for recidivism, that treatment should target criminogenic needs, and that treatment should be fine-tailored to the learning style, motivation, abilities and strength of the offender (Andrews & Bonta, 2007).”
Reductions in Risk Based on Time Offense-Free in the Community: Once a Sexual Offender, Not Always a Sexual Offender (2017, background): “One simple explanation is that many individuals eventually learned how to make a prosocial lifestyle rewarding (Andrews & Bonta, 2010; Thornton, 2016).”
Quantitative syntheses of the effects of administrative segregation on inmates’ well-being. (2016, background): “Lastly, the rationale that AS produces criminal behavior because it creates mental health problems fails to recognize that symptoms of alienation, anxiety, depression, and schizoid thinking are among the weakest predictors of recidivism (Andrews & Bonta, 2010; Gendreau, Little, & Goggin, 1996).”
Looking Inside the Black Box of Drug Courts: A Meta‐Analytic Review (2011, background): “Consistent with this perspective, it would seem that a more comprehensive explanation of the drug court model should also consider the principles of effective interventions (EI; see Andrews & Bonta, 2006; Gendreau, 1996).”
Applying Risk/Need Assessment to Probation Practice and its Impact on the Recidivism of Young Offenders (2011, background): “It is composed of 45 static and dynamic risk items that are grouped into eight subcomponents that are consistent with the “central eight” risk domains (Andrews & Bonta, 2006, 2010).”
Helping Others as a Response to Reconcile a Criminal Past (2015, methodology): “…healer in the desistance process is consistent with several of the Central Eight risk/need factors of the risk-need-responsivity (RNR) model (D. A. Andrews & Bonta, 2010), such as reduced antisocial cognitions and fewer antisocial associates, a supportive work situation, and being actively…”
Dynamic risk and protective factors (2016, background): “© 2015 Taylor & Francis CONTACT Ralph C. Serin ralph_serin@carleton.ca Andrews and Bonta (2010) presented a hierarchy of risk factors intended to identify appropriate targets for rehabilitation programmes; their choice of variables was consistent with a conceptualisation of dynamic risk factors as…”
The Risk Need Responsivity Model of Offender Rehabilitation: Is There Really a Need for a Paradigm Shift?. (2013, methodology): “For instance, Andrews and Bonta (2010) pay no attention to issues associated with trauma.”