Most items in structured risk assessment instruments do not predict violence

By Jeremy Coid, Min Yang, S. Ullrich, Tianqiang Zhang, S. Sizmur, David P. Farrington, Robert D. Rogers. 2011

95 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/456f2f793e73a06bcafb2ebd7a0659e9a7ad8b75

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. J. Skeem
2. J. Monahan
3. Min Yang
4. Jeremy Coid
5. Alexandra Chouldechova
6. Cynthia Rudin
7. Richard A. Berk

In Sociology and Political Science

1. J. Skeem
2. J. Monahan
3. Min Yang
4. Jeremy Coid
5. Alexandra Chouldechova
6. Cynthia Rudin
7. Richard A. Berk

Citations in the corpus

• A Comparison of Logistic Regression, Classification and Regression Tree, and Neural Networks Models in Predicting Violent Re-Offending (2011, background): “Furthermore, instruments designed to predict violence lack outcome specificity for violence and their predictive items include measures predicting general criminality (Coid et al. 2011; Glover et al. 2002; Hemphill et al. 1998).”
• Risk Assessment in Criminal Sentencing. (2016, background): “Some evidence suggests that a limiting process makes recidivism impossible to predict beyond a certain level of accuracy (Coid et al. 2011).”