K. Douglas

Clinical Psychology · with Skeem · 2001–2014

A researcher in the Science corpus: 11 papers; trusts 31 researchers and is trusted by 19 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Clinical Psychology — 51 citations into it; #1,264 of 8,024 by trust here, #2,124 by citations
• Sociology and Political Science — 48 citations into it; #5,891 of 22,756 by trust here, #6,087 by citations
• General Health Professions — 12 citations into it
• Social Psychology — 12 citations into it
• Statistics and Probability — 9 citations into it
• Psychiatry and Mental health — 8 citations into it
• Experimental and Cognitive Psychology — 7 citations into it; #4,906 of 9,731 by trust here, #8,664 by citations
• Management Science and Operations Research — 5 citations into it

Whom K. Douglas trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Dan Nagin
2. Demetra Andrews
3. D. Kroner
4. DavidJ. Cooke
5. G. Sjöstedt
6. J. Landis
7. M. Grann
8. P. Lachenbruch
9. Richard E. Tremblay
10. Eddie Harmon-Jones

Who trusts K. Douglas overall

1. V. de Vogel
2. M. de Vries Robbé
3. Jennifer E. Storey
4. G. Vincent
5. J. Skeem
6. Min Yang
7. R. Serin
8. Jeremy Coid
9. Laura S. Guy
10. Tonia L. Nicholls

Papers from K. Douglas's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers K. Douglas trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical–statistical controversy.
2. Refining the construct of psychopathy: towards a hierarchical model. (Psychological Assessment)
3. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.)
4. Effective correctional treatment and violent reoffending: A meta-analysis
5. HCR-20: Violence risk management companion guide
6. The Spousal Assault Risk Assessment (SARA) Guide: Reliability and Validity in Adult Male Offenders
7. Comparing Effect Sizes in Follow-Up Studies: ROC Area, Cohen's d, and r (Law and Human Behavior)
8. SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models (Behavoir research methods, instruments & computers)
9. HCR‐20. Assessing risk for violence, version 2. By C. Webster, K. Douglas, D. Eaves and S. Hart. Mental Health, Law and Policy Institute, British Columbia. 1997. 98 + vii pp
10. Post-hoc probing of significant moderational and mediational effects in studies of pediatric populations. (Journal of Pediatric Psychology)

Their papers

• Comparative Validity Analysis of Multiple Measures of Violence Risk in a Sample of Criminal Offenders (2005) — 183 citations
• VIOLENCE RISK ASSESSMENT: Getting Specific About Being Dynamic (2005) — 648 citations
• Assessing the link between stalking and domestic violence (2001) — 107 citations
• Procedural justice versus risk factors for offending: predicting recidivism in youth. (2014) — 97 citations
• Risk factors and protective factors: a two-sided dynamic approach to violence risk assessment (2013) — 114 citations
• The Perceived Stress Scale: Evaluating Configural, Metric and Scalar Invariance across Mental Health Status and Gender (2011) — 132 citations
• Historical-Clinical-Risk Management-20 (HCR-20) Violence Risk Assessment Scheme: Rationale, Application, and Empirical Overview (2010) — 95 citations
• Handbook of violence risk assessment. (2010) — 181 citations
• Does Gender Moderate the Predictive Utility of the Level of Service Inventory—Revised (LSI-R) for Serious Violent Offenders? (2009) — 96 citations
• Risk for Criminal Recidivism: The Role of Psychopathy. (2006) — 180 citations
• HCR-20: Violence risk management companion guide (2001) — 128 citations