Information systems evaluation: navigating through the problem domain

By Zahir Irani. Information Manager (The), 2002

431 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Information Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a751b0493c388bc630cdbbe1494a97c764b67761

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Information Systems

Citations in the corpus

Evaluating e‐government: learning from the experiences of two UK local authorities (2005, background): “…no management processes to govern and measure the achievement of desired outcomes, neither do they have processes to establish what beneﬁts were actually achieved (Farbey et al ., 1993; Willcocks & Lester, 1994; Smithson & Hirschheim, 1998; Remenyi et al ., 2000; Irani & Love, 2001; Irani, 2002).”
Revisiting IS business value research: what we already know, what we still need to know, and how we can get there (2013, background): “…body of IS business value literature (see, for example, Soh & Markus, 1995; Shin, 1997; Bannister & Remenyi, 2000; Brynjolfsson & Hitt, 2000; Devaraj & Kohli, 2000; Irani & Love, 2001; Irani, 2002; Oz, 2005), task (b) seems to be more challenging, particularly for intangible value items.”
Big data analytics and firm performance: Effects of dynamic capabilities (2017, background): “Their findings suggest that the absence of a positive link between IS investment and firm performance found by prior studies may be explained by several factors including the unavailability of appropriate data, the existence of time lags between IS investments and the business value generated from t”
An exploratory study of information technology evaluation and benefits management practices of SMEs in the construction industry (2004, background): “Furthermore, it has been suggested that generic evaluation techniques exclusively based on standard accounting methods simply do not work, an application specific approach recommended [17] [28].”
Investigating the effect of website quality on e-business success: An analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach (2006, background): “A field study with 156 online customers and 34 managers/designers of e-business companies was performed.”
IT alignment: what have we learned? (2007, background): “The business and IT performance implications of alignment have been demonstrated empirically and through case studies during the last decade (e.g. Chan et al ., 1997; de Leede et al ., 2002; Irani, 2002; Kearns and Lederer, 2003).”
Antecedents and outcomes of strategic IS alignment: an empirical investigation (2006, background): “The last hypothesis tests the common belief that alignment is related to organizational performance [11], [18], [30], [35], [38].”
FACTORS AFFECTING THE SUCCESSFUL IMPLEMENTATION OF ICT PROJECTS IN GOVERNMENT (2005, background): “Evaluating ICT projects can be quite problematic and can sometimes be quite subjective (Heeks 2002, Currie 1995, Bannister, Remenyi 2004, Irani 2002, DeLone and McLean 2002, Bannister and Remenyi 2000) and there is no single ICT evaluation method that can be applied to all situations (Khalifa et…”
Factors affecting ERP system adoption: A comparative analysis between SMEs and large companies (2005, background): “Consequently, this has resulted in the widespread adoption of ERP solutions (Irani, 2002).”