Effectiveness of quality improvement strategies on the management of diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

By Andrea C. Tricco, N. Ivers, Jeremy M. Grimshaw, David Moher, Lucy Turner, J. Galipeau, Ilana Halperin, Brigitte Vachon, T. Ramsay, Braden J. Manns and 2 more. The Lancet, 2012

653 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2013 (2012, background): “Objective 3: Change the system of care The most successful practices have an institutional priority for providing high quality of care (517).”
How to study improvement interventions: a brief overview of possible study types (2015, background): “87 Systematic reviews of improvement studies, whether or not they include meta-analyses, are now beginning to appear, 88 – 92 and are likely to play an important role in providing overviews of the evidence supporting particular interventions or methods of achieving change.”
Guidelines for the Primary Prevention of Stroke (2011, neutral): “Quality improvement efforts that include activities that focus on the system, the provider, and the patient, as well as the coordination of services across these domains, are often the most effective.(949) Studies examining the effectiveness of stroke education programs have generally identified a m”
Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2014 (2013, background): “Care The most successful practices have an institutional priority for providing high quality of care (609).”
2017 National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (2012, neutral): “For DSMES services to be sustainable, quality must be a priority.(84,85)”