Jeff Stone

Sociology and Political Science · 2001–2012

A researcher in the Science corpus: 7 papers; trusts 10 researchers and is trusted by 9 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Sociology and Political Science — 38 citations into it; #7,552 of 22,756 by trust here, #5,224 by citations
• Social Psychology — 23 citations into it; #5,531 of 15,694 by trust here, #4,888 by citations
• Gender Studies — 19 citations into it; #4,072 of 4,924 by trust here, #2,854 by citations
• Experimental and Cognitive Psychology — 7 citations into it
• Applied Psychology — 6 citations into it

Whom Jeff Stone trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. T. Schmader
2. C. Steele
3. Darren J. A. Yopyk
4. S. Spencer
5. C. Harrison
6. Michael Johns
7. Brandon E. Martin
8. Sapna Cheryan
9. Jonathon D. Brown
10. Deborah A. Prentice

Who trusts Jeff Stone overall

1. Jessi L. Smith
2. C. Harrison
3. T. Schmader
4. Tamar SzaboGendler
5. A. Saini
6. Markus Appel
7. J. Stone
8. D. Sherman
9. A. Chalabaev
10. Caryn J. Block

Papers from Jeff Stone's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Jeff Stone trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. When saying and doing diverge: The effects ofstereotype threat on self-reported versus nonverbal anxiety
2. Battle of the sexes: gender stereotype confirmation and reactance in negotiations. (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)
3. An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance. (Psychology Review)
4. Identity bifurcation in response to stereotype threat: Women and mathematics
5. When Positive Stereotypes Threaten Intellectual Performance: The Psychological Hazards of “Model Minority” Status
6. Battling Doubt by Avoiding Practice: The Effects of Stereotype Threat on Self-Handicapping in White Athletes
7. Am I an Athlete or a Student? Identity Salience and Stereotype Threat in Student–Athletes
8. A Threatening Intellectual Environment: Why Females Are Susceptible to Experiencing Problem-Solving Deficits in the Presence of Males (Psychology Science)
9. Constructing Academic Inadequacy
10. The Role of Gender Identities and Stereotype Salience With the Academic Performance of Male and Female College Athletes

Their papers

• A Self-Standards Model of Cognitive Dissonance (2001) — 457 citations
• Evidence that blatant versus subtle stereotype threat cues impact performance through dual processes. (2008) — 151 citations
• To Practice What We Preach: The Use of Hypocrisy and Cognitive Dissonance to Motivate Behavior Change (2008) — 205 citations
• The Role of Gender Identities and Stereotype Salience With the Academic Performance of Male and Female College Athletes (2009) — 114 citations
• “Don't Call Me a Student-Athlete”: The Effect of Identity Priming on Stereotype Threat for Academically Engaged African American College Athletes (2012) — 100 citations
• Athletic Voices and Academic Victories: African American Male Student-Athlete Experiences in the Pac-Ten (2010) — 94 citations
• Battling Doubt by Avoiding Practice: The Effects of Stereotype Threat on Self-Handicapping in White Athletes (2002) — 284 citations