An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance.

1,477 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

On the epistemic costs of implicit bias (2011, background): “(Schmader et al. 2008, pp. 336–337).”
Ingroup Experts and Peers as Social Vaccines Who Inoculate the Self-Concept: The Stereotype Inoculation Model (2011, background): “Challenge appraisals promote better performance on difficult tasks than threat appraisals (Jamieson, Mendes, Blackstock, & Schmader, 2010; Schmader et al., 2008; Tomaka & Blascovich, 1994; White, 2002).”
STEMing the tide: using ingroup experts to inoculate women's self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). (2011, background): “Extant research on stereotype threat has examined stereotyped individuals’ performance on specific domain-relevant tests, together with cognitive, emotional, and physiological reactions during the test or in anticipation of it (for a review, see Schmader et al., 2008).”
Engineering Exchanges (2015, result): “This finding is consistent with other experimental evidence that cues to social identity threat impair working memory capacity (Schmader et al., 2008) and promote ego depletion (Inzlicht, Tullett, Legault, & Kang, 2011).”