Mina C. Johnson-Glenberg
Developmental and Educational Psychology · 2000–2018
A researcher in the Science corpus: 2 papers; trusts 22 researchers and is trusted by 7 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Developmental and Educational Psychology — 18 citations into it; #2,269 of 8,223 by trust here, #4,622 by citations
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology — 12 citations into it
- Human-Computer Interaction — 11 citations into it; #932 of 2,253 by trust here, #1,813 by citations
- Social Psychology — 10 citations into it; #6,525 of 15,694 by trust here, #12,701 by citations
- Cognitive Neuroscience — 7 citations into it
- Education — 5 citations into it; #5,463 of 11,309 by trust here, #8,269 by citations
Whom Mina C. Johnson-Glenberg trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
- Martha W. Alibali
- Lawrence W. Barsalou
- Marc Jeannerod
- Roy D. Pea
- M. Jeong
- Valerie J. Shute
- Mihály Csíkszentmihályi
- Mitchell J. Nathan
- Arthur M. Glenberg
- Autumn B. Hostetter
Who trusts Mina C. Johnson-Glenberg overall
- Anthony Scavarelli
- L. Meltzer
- Ali Arya
- Hilde Van Keer
- Robert J. Teather
- Nazmi Sofian Suhaimi
- David A. Kilpatrick
Papers from Mina C. Johnson-Glenberg's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers Mina C. Johnson-Glenberg trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception
- Grounded cognition.
- Grounding language in action (Psychonomic Bulletin & Review)
- Neural Simulation of Action: A Unifying Mechanism for Motor Cognition (NeuroImage)
- Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. (Neuron)
- The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience (Cybernetics & Human Knowing)
- Embodiment in Mathematics Teaching and Learning: Evidence From Learners' and Teachers' Gestures
- Embodiment as a unifying perspective for psychology
- Visible embodiment: Gestures as simulated action (Psychonomic Bulletin & Review)
- Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching