The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience

By A. Combs, Guy Burneko, Sally Goerner, Tracy Brown, H. Guenther. Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 2002

4,272 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/81b30773d4d404649cebdbb2581d0fdbed941d2a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

From cognitivism to autopoiesis: towards a computational framework for the embodied mind (2016, background): “The ‘body’ in question is squarely inside the head—absent are the dense causal, dynamical couplings between internal and external phenomenon that characterize enactive views of embodied cognition (Chemero 2011; Gallagher 2000; Varela et al. 1991).”
The sense of agency – a phenomenological consequence of enacting sensorimotor schemes (2017, background): “In light of the pragmatic turn in cognitive science (Varela et al. 1991; O’Regan and Noë 2001; Noë 2004; Engel et al. 2013), such doubts may at least warrant the exploration of less representation-centric alternatives.”
Embodied Mind, Situated Cognition, and Expressive Microtiming in African-American Music (2002, background): “The mind’s embodiment provides natural biases for inductive models and representations, and thus automatically grounds cognitive processes that might normally be considered disembodied (Varela et al., 1991).”
Self–other contingencies: Enacting social perception (2009, background): “This is the concept of “reciprocal determinism” or “reciprocal causation” often referred to in the enactive literature, the basis of what Varela et al. (1991) call the “fundamental circularity.””
Tacit knowledge acquisition and sharing in a project work context (2003, background): “This means that knowledge is context dependent and situation sensitive [20,34].”
Emotion and ethics: An inter-(en)active approach (2009, background): “Overall, the aim of this contribution is to bring into relief aspects of participatory sense-making that have been, so far, relatively under-examined within the ‘enactivist’ tradition (Varela, Thompson, and Rosch 1991; Thompson 2007) to which De Jaegher and Di Paolo’s work belongs.”
Reasoning With Tools and Inscriptions (2002, background): “Minick, 1987). Furthermore, I viewed the teacher and students as collectively enacting a normative world of signification rather than as representing a world ( Varela, Thompson, & Rosch, 1991 ).”
The Phenomenological Mind (2007, unknown): “different scales of duration (Pöppel 1988; Varela 1999; Varela et al. 1981), the first two of which”
Some reflections on the origins of MBSR, skillful means, and the trouble with maps (2011, background): “’ What seemed called for, practically speaking, was an instrumental and operational emphasis on what is actually involved in the gesture of awareness, to use Francisco Varela's elegant phrase (Depraz, Varela and Vermesch 1999 ; Varela, Thompson and Rosch 1991 ).”
TRoPICALS: a computational embodied neuroscience model of compatibility effects. (2010, background): “The third type of constraint (embodiment constraints) is in line with embodied cognitive science and the simulation of adaptive behaviorapproaches (Meyer & Wilson, 1991; Varela, Thompson, & Rosch, 1991; Webb, 1995, 2009).”