Association between funding and quality of published medical education research.

By Darcy A. Reed, D. A. Cook, T. Beckman, R. Levine, D. Kern, S. Wright. Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), 2007

870 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0ed1337f3a2f60239c298d36c17dc8ca535b07c7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

1. Leisi Pei
2. D. A. Cook
3. B. Zendejas
4. P. Erwin
5. Hongbin Wu
6. Ryan Brydges
7. S. Hamstra
8. R. Hatala

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

1. P. Erwin
2. B. Zendejas
3. Ryan Brydges
4. S. Hamstra
5. R. Hatala
6. D. A. Cook
7. Jason H. Szostek
8. Amy T. Wang

Citations in the corpus

• Gamification of health professions education: a systematic review (2020, methodology): “We used the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI) to measure the methodological quality of the selected studies (Reed et al. 2007).”
• Does online learning work better than offline learning in undergraduate medical education? A systematic review and meta-analysis (2019, methodology): “Quality assessment The quality of methodology used in each article was evaluated based on the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI) [14].”
• Comparative effectiveness of instructional design features in simulation-based education: Systematic review and meta-analysis (2013, methodology): “2005), even though funding is associated with higher quality work (Reed et al. 2007).”
• Mastery Learning for Health Professionals Using Technology-Enhanced Simulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2013, methodology): “Methodological quality was graded using two previously described instruments, the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument 14 (MERSQI) and an adaptation of the Newcastle–Ottawa scale (NOS) for cohort studies.”
• A Systematic Review of Empirical Studies on Learning Analytics Dashboards: A Self-Regulated Learning Perspective (2020, methodology): “The instrument used in this study was informed by the MERSQI (Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument) instrument [32] and the coding scheme used in [33].”