Online mentoring and computer-mediated communication: New directions in research

By Ellen A. Ensher, Christian Heun, Anita L. Blanchard. 2003

341 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5f96ec7215e0bcd27f490e5bedb9a784a751579c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The Mentoring Relationship Challenges Scale: The impact of mentoring stage, type, and gender (2011, background): “In fact, the results of Ensher and Murphy's (2005) qualitative research suggested that most protégés appreciated the experience of being tested by their mentors and felt that relational challenges contributed to their satisfaction with the relationship.”
“There's magic in the web”: e‐mentoring for women's career development (2005, background): “There is a lack of empirical evidence from schemes that exploit the full potential of computer-mediated communication (CMC) ( Ensher et al. , 2003”
Mentoring Together: A Literature Review of Group Mentoring (2012, background): “At the same time, Packard (2003) was cultivating the same group mentoring soil as Ensher et al. (2003).”
An Ecological Systems Perspective on Mentoring at Work: A Review and Future Prospects (2011, background): “Similarly, Ensher, Heun, and Blanchard (2003) suggest that online mentoring can be as effective as face-to-face mentoring.”
Mapping a Mentoring Roadmap and Developing a Supportive Network for Strategic Career Advancement (2017, background): “…Lee, et al., 2015; Packard, 2003; Whittaker, Montgomery, & Martinez Acosta, 2015), engaged via electronic platforms (Blake-Beard et al., 2011; Ensher et al., 2003; Guerrero-Me-dina et al., 2013; Long et al., 2014; Wadia-Fascetti & Lev-entman, 2000; Whittaker & Montgomery, 2014; Whittaker et…”
Who Is a Mentor? A Review of Evolving Definitions and Implications for Research (2011, background): “One area in which scholars agree is the need for research as there are few empirical studies examining e-mentoring (Ensher et al., 2003; Ensher & Murphy, 2007; Hamilton & Scandura, 2003; Noe et al., 2002).”
A comparison of face-to-face and electronic peer-mentoring: Interactions with mentor gender (2008, methodology): “It has been argued previously that e-mentoring may reduce inhibitions associated with status cues (e.g., Ensher et al., 2003 ).”
E‐mentoring for social equity: review of research to inform program development (2005, background): “Other scholars have written conceptual and theoretical articles in which they discussed e-mentoring and e-mentoring programs, their potential and applications, and suggested directions in research (Bierema & Merriam, 2002; Hamilton & Scandura, 2002; Ensher, et al., 2003; Kealy & Mullen, 2003a, b).”