E‐mentoring for social equity: review of research to inform program development

By P. Boyle Single, Richard M. Single. 2005

171 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Education, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/227adb82744842a9256d963f44acae397960d638

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Charyl Staci Yarbrough
2. Kimberly A. Smith-Jentsch
3. Shannon Scielzo
4. Patrick J. Rosopa

In Education

1. Charyl Staci Yarbrough
2. Kimberly A. Smith-Jentsch
3. Shannon Scielzo
4. Patrick J. Rosopa

In Social Psychology

1. Charyl Staci Yarbrough
2. Kimberly A. Smith-Jentsch
3. Shannon Scielzo
4. Patrick J. Rosopa

Citations in the corpus

• A comparison of face-to-face and electronic peer-mentoring: Interactions with mentor gender (2008, methodology): “Second, it has been argued that e-mentoring should primarily be used when face-to-face mentoring is not possible ( Single & Single, 2005 ).”
• Toward a Conceptual Model of Mentoring Research: Integration with Self-Regulated Learning (2013, unknown): “Although Single and Single (2005) found benefits of e-mentoring for protégés ’ job-related and interpersonal skills, research is needed to determine how mentoring and self-regulatory processes operate when mentors and protégés communicate virtually.”