The Influence of Individualism, Collectivism, and Locus of Control on Environmental Beliefs and Behavior

By John A. Mccarty, L. Shrum. 2001

668 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Marketing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ffcf440add980f86f297bb5198fab8d360de2d52

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. Jayesh Patel
2. Arpan Yagnik
3. Rohit H. Trivedi
4. You kyung Lee
5. Jörg Matthes
6. Leslie C Carlson
7. Eddie W. L. Cheng
8. C. Lai

In Marketing

1. Jayesh Patel
2. Arpan Yagnik
3. Rohit H. Trivedi
4. You kyung Lee
5. Leslie C Carlson
6. Jörg Matthes
7. Zhao-Hong Cheng
8. Eddie W. L. Cheng

Citations in the corpus

• Shades of green: linking environmental locus of control and pro‐environmental behaviors (2005, background): “, a recent investigation found LOC to be positively related to beliefs about recycling ( McCarty and Shrum, 2001”
• Cultural antecedents of green behavioral intent: An environmental theory of planned behavior (2015, background): “…linked to socially responsible behavior, where people with a higher level of interdependence deliberated more on collective outcomes when making decisions (Arnocky, Stroink, & deCicco, 2007; McCarty & Shrum, 2001), while independence predicted egoistic environmental concern (Arnocky et al., 2007).”
• Predictor of Business Students’ Attitudes Toward Sustainable Business Practices (2010, background): “, 2005; McCarty and Shrum, 2001), and cross-cultural differences (Cummings, 2008; McCarty and Shrum, 2001).”
• Environmentally friendly consumer choices: Cultural differences in the self-regulatory function of anticipated pride and guilt (2014, positive): “Previous findings have shown that self-construal plays an important role in predicting thoughts and behaviours related to the environment (Arnocky, Stroink, & DeCicco, 2007; McCarty & Shrum, 2001).”
• The Dominant Social Paradigm, Consumption, and Environmental Attitudes: Can Macromarketing Education Help? (2008, methodology): “These questions were drawn from previous environmental research by Milbrath (1984) and Cotgrove (1982).”
• The Skeptical Green Consumer Revisited: Testing the Relationship Between Green Consumerism and Skepticism Toward Advertising (2014, background): “In addition, perceived consumer effectiveness with respect to green products has been found to be a strong predictor of green consumption (Ellen, Wiener, and Cobb-Walgren 1991; Kim and Choi 2005; McCarty and Shrum 2001; Schwepker and Cornwell 1991; Straughan and Roberts 1999).”
• Self-identity and internal environmental locus of control: Comparing their influences on green purchase intentions in high-context versus low-context cultures (2020, positive): “For American consumers, green self-identity has a higher influence on PBC than does attitude.”
• Understanding the green buying behavior of younger Millennials from India and the United States: A structural equation modeling approach (2016, background): “Consumers from a collectivistic culture have shown to be committed to the environment (Li 1997) and are more conscious of their environmental footprint than those belonging to an individualistic culture (McCarty and Shrum 2001).”