Using Multilevel Random Coefficient Modeling to Analyze Social Interaction Diary Data
By J. Nezlek. 2003
106 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ff1026e626cd0df4d4d8daa4dae06f58d17cbba1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- S. Jowett
- Peter Salovey
- Simine Vazire
- James W. Pennebaker
- Richard B. Slatcher
- Stephen Wood
- Toby D. Wall
- Peter Totterdell
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Peter Salovey
- Marc A. Brackett
- P. Lopes
- Simine Vazire
- Peter Totterdell
- Richard B. Slatcher
- Astrid Schütz
- I. Sellin
In Social Psychology
- Marc A. Brackett
- Peter Salovey
- P. Lopes
- Astrid Schütz
- Richard B. Slatcher
- J. Nezlek
- S. Jowett
- Simine Vazire
Citations in the corpus
- Am “I” more important than “we”? Couples’ word use in instant messages (2008, methodology): “IM allows researchers to subtly and unobtrusively study close relationships in naturalistic settings, complementing existing methods such as daily diaries (Bolger, Davis, & Rafaeli, 2003; Drigotas, Whitney, & Rusbult, 1995; Nezlek, 2003; Reis, 1994).”
- An intra‐individual test of the demands‐control model: A weekly diary study of psychological strain in portfolio workers (2006, methodology): “The incremental modelbuilding approach that we took is therefore preferable for multi-level analysis (Nezlek, 2003).”
- Emotional Intelligence and Social Interaction (2004, methodology): “Accordingly, relationships between EI and social interaction were analyzed using MRCM as implemented by the program HLM (Raudenbush, Bryk, Cheong, & Congdon, 2000; see Nezlek, 2001b, 2003, for detailed discussions about this type of analysis).”
- Relationship interdependence and satisfaction with important outcomes in coach–athlete dyads (2012, background): “For example, to test a hypothesis that same- and mixed-sex dyads differ, constraints of -1, -1, þ1, þ1 could be applied to gender composition (FF þ MM versus FCMA þ MCFA) (Nezlek, 2003).”
- A multilevel framework for understanding relationships among traits, states, situations and behaviours (2007, background): “The coefficient can still vary non-randomly (Nezlek, 2003, 2007), that is it is still possible to examine level 2 differences in the level 1 coefficients.”
- An Introduction to Multilevel Modeling for Social and Personality Psychology (2008, background): “See Nezlek (2001) for a general discussion of multilevel modeling analyses of such data and Nezlek (2003) for a more specific discussion of multilevel analyses of social interaction diary data.”