A multilevel framework for understanding relationships among traits, states, situations and behaviours

By J. Nezlek. 2007

159 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d5ab6d251f6ffcec2b7f8c6b99cc411e3aa71be1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

An Introduction to Multilevel Modeling for Social and Personality Psychology (2008, background): “See Nezlek (2007a, 2007b) for discussions of multilevel analyses of such data structures.”
Trait and Daily Emotion Regulation in Social Anxiety Disorder (2016, methodology): “At Level 1, we specified daily measures to examine fluctuation over time centered on each participant’s mean over the data collection (see Nezlek 2007 for rationale).”
Within-Person Variability in Job Performance (2014, methodology): “Moreover, reporting the mean of a series of coefficients alpha, one for each time point/observation, is also inappropriate because the specific time points are typically somewhat arbitrary and cannot considered to be sampled randomly (Nezlek, 2007).”
Back to the Future: Personality and Assessment and Personality Development. (2009, methodology): “The model builds on other state-trait models (e.g., Nezlek, 2007; Steyer, Schmitt, & Eid, 1999) and differs in subtle but significant ways from the FFM, Neo-Allportian, social cognitive, and the levels approaches to personality traits.”
Predictors of Identity Management (2017, background): “Although contemporary scholars agree that behavior results from the joint effects of person and situation factors, much remains to be learned regarding how this occurs (Nezlek, 2007).”
The disaggregation of within-person and between-person effects in longitudinal models of change. (2011, background): “In some respects, these two types of differences mirror the classic distinction between traits and states (Nezlek 2007).”
Everyday working life: Explaining within-person fluctuations in employee well-being (2012, result): “…of this between-person approach in the study of employee well-being, researchers started to question its predictive validity owing to inconsistent findings with regard to the relationship between traits, work-related well-being and job behaviours across different situations (Nezlek, 2008).”