Relationship interdependence and satisfaction with important outcomes in coach–athlete dyads

By S. Jowett, J. Nezlek. 2012

158 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Gender Studies, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/85556536f4de0c3ecf1431780ef7a325af702493

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Vaithehy Shanmugam
2. Mark S. Allen
3. Marc V Jones
4. S. Jowett
5. I. Greenlees
6. R. Lorimer

In Gender Studies

1. Vaithehy Shanmugam
2. S. Jowett
3. I. Greenlees

In Social Psychology

1. Vaithehy Shanmugam
2. Mark S. Allen
3. Marc V Jones
4. S. Jowett
5. I. Greenlees
6. N. LaVoi
7. R. Lorimer
8. Daniel J. A. Rhind

Citations in the corpus

• Personality in sport: a comprehensive review (2013, background): “Research into these areas would be particularly valuable to practising sport psychologists targeting interpersonal relationships in athlete athlete and coach athlete dyads (see Jowett & Nezlek, 2012; Rhind & Jowett, 2011).”
• Relational coaching in sport: Its psychological underpinnings and practical effectiveness (2016, background): “Moreover, research findings indicate that the association between relationship quality and different facets of satisfaction is moderated by coaches and athletes’ relationship length, performance levels, and dyads’ gender composition (Jowett & Nezlek, 2012).”
• Motivational processes in the coach‐athlete relationship: A multi‐cultural self‐determination approach (2017, unknown): “The 3Cs model has received empirical support with athletes and coaches of different ages, genders, and levels of performance (e.g., Jowett & Nezlek, 2012), different types of sport (e.g., Rhind, Jowett, & Yang, 2012), personality traits (Yang, Jowett, & Chan, 2015), and different cultural groups…”