Peer Victimization in Middle School

By S. Graham, Amy Bellmore, Jaana Juvonen. 2003

112 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Safety Research, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fe8e7dc5af246ebeccfaface680d2ded613c5c33

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Dorothy Espelage
2. Susan M. Swearer
3. Melissa K. Holt
4. David Finkelhor
5. Glenda Kaufman Kantor
6. Shelley Hymel
7. T. Vaillancourt
8. D. Cornell

In Safety Research

1. Dorothy Espelage
2. Melissa K. Holt
3. Susan M. Swearer
4. David Finkelhor
5. Glenda Kaufman Kantor
6. Shelley Hymel
7. C. Branson
8. D. Cornell

In Social Psychology

1. Dorothy Espelage
2. Susan M. Swearer
3. Shelley Hymel
4. David Finkelhor
5. Glenda Kaufman Kantor
6. Melissa K. Holt
7. C. Branson
8. D. Cornell

Citations in the corpus

• A Comparison of Self and Peer Reports in the Assessment of Middle School Bullying (2009, background): “Other researchers have used the two measures in combination to identify aggressive or victimized students (Graham et al., 2003).”
• Hidden Forms of Victimization in Elementary Students Involved in Bullying (2007, background): “Finally, findings are based on self-report data and accordingly have some limitations (Juvoven et al., 2000), although research points to the importance of collecting selfreport data given that it yields unique information (Graham et al., 2003).”
• What Can Be Done About School Bullying? (2010, result): “Some studies have documented weak agreement across self- versus peer reports of bullying (Cole, Cornell, &: Sheras, 2006; Graham et al., 2003; Juvonen, Nishna, & Graham, 2001), although others have demonstrated more consistent agreement among younger (Frey et al., 2009) and among older children…”