Collaborative Creativity: Contemporary Perspectives

By Dorothy Miell, Karen Littleton. 2004

121 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fe5e1dbef75f5faecfb6b93b65db609f6acf757f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Thinking about Creativity in Science Education (2012, unknown): “It is for this reason that creativity is increasingly considered a socio-related issue (Miell & Littleton, 2004; Ricchuito, 1996).”
Pedagogy and Possibility Thinking in the Early Years (2006, result): “By contrast, others have explored collaborative creativity (e.g. Miell and Littleton, 2004; Miell et al, 2005).”
The Social Brain, Language, and Goal-Directed Collective Thinking: A Social Conception of Cognition and Its Implications for Understanding How We Think, Teach, and Learn (2013, background): “Several studies take a sociocultural theoretical perspective, in which culturally framed ways of communicating and the use of cultural tools are considered important (Miell & Littleton, 2004; Paulus & Nijstad, 2003; Sawyer, 2012; Sawyer & DeZutter, 2009).”
How are we creative together? Comparing sociocognitive and sociocultural answers (2011, background): “Nowadays though we find signs of development, observed both in terms of published books (see Littleton and Miell, 2004) and journal issues (see the special issue “Collaborative creativity: Socio-cultural perspectives” in Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2008).”
Theoretical and Pedagogical Perspectives on Orchestrating Creativity and Collaborative Learning. (2011, background): “…to this perspective, creativity involves situated interaction processes with other members working with the topic that are mediated by the present context (e.g. tools, forms and technologies) (Glăveanu, 2010; John-Steiner, 2000; Miell & Littleton, 2004; Paulus & Nijstad, 2003; Sawyer, 2006b).”