Inclusion in Physical Education: A review of literature

By Jing Qi, A. Ha. 2012

225 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fe43ecaabb82d1652e91374cee5c26612e34e656

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Safety Research

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Forty years later, a systematic literature review on inclusion in physical education (1975–2015): A teacher perspective (2016, background): “Given the singularity of each individual plan of inclusion, the multidisciplinary training could be performed locally in the regular school with the different partners in the educational community (Qi & Ha, 2012b).”
Applying the theory of planned behaviour in assessments of teachers’ intentions towards practicing inclusive education: a scoping review (2020, background): “While Pocock and Miyahara (2017) qualitative meta-analysis focused on literature from North America and Qi and Ha (2012a) review including research conducted mainly in developed countries.”
Changing attitudes to inclusion in preservice teacher education: a systematic review (2019, background): “…of the main reasons why (preservice) teachers’ attitude towards inclusion has gained an increasing amount of research interest (see reviews by Avramidis and Norwich 2002; de Boer, Pijl, and Minnaert 2011; Qi and Ha 2012) and dominates this research area (see review by Wilhelmsen and Sørensen 2017).”
Perspectives of Students with Disabilities Toward Physical Education: A Qualitative Inquiry Review (2015, background): “%) of published studies that explored perceptions toward physical education for students with disabilities did so from the teacher’s perspective (Qi & Ha, 2012).”
An analysis of research on inclusive education: a systematic search and meta review (2018, background): “Peer support practices are mentioned in five studies (De Vroey, Struyf, and Petry 2016; Kaya, Blake, and Chan 2015; Reichrath, de Witte, and Winkens 2010; Watkins et al. 2015; Qi and Ha 2012).”
Inclusion Illusion: Questioning the Inclusiveness of Integrated Physical Education (2019, background): “…has tended to focus on the perspectives of parents (An & Hodge, 2013; Perkins, Columna, Lieberman, & Bailey, 2013); peers without disabilities (Grenier et al., 2014; McKay, Block, & Park, 2015); or physical education teachers (Combs, Elliott, & Whipple, 2010; Hodge et al., 2009; Qi & Ha, 2012).”