Knowing What You Know and What You Don't: Further Research on Metacognitive Knowledge Monitoring

148 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Metacognitive Knowledge Monitoring and Self-Regulated Learning: Academic Success and Reflections on Learning. (2006, background): “This study and others (e.g., Hacker et.al., 2000; Tobias and Everson, 2000, 2002; Maki, 1995) are demonstrating a strong relationship between MKM and academic performance but the causal relationship is unclear.”
Enhancing expatriates’ assignments success: the relationships between cultural intelligence, cross-cultural adaptation and performance (2020, background): “This may stimulate the adoption of effective solutions to perform well (Tobias and Everson 2002).”
Multi-method assessment of metacognitive skills in elementary school children: how you test is what you get (2008, unknown): “Since Flavell introduced the concept 30 years ago, different methods to assess metacognition have been used (Tobias and Everson 2002).”
Investigating motivation in context: Developing sociocultural perspectives (2004, methodology): “All other measures featured in the Cluster Analysis and HLM tables were based on other measures (e.g., LT-Knowledge Monitoring used a Hamann Coefficient – Tobias & Everson, 2002).”
CONFIDENCE AND COGNITIVE TEST PERFORMANCE (2007, background): “In educational research, the same question is asked under the rubric of metacognition (Schraw & Dennison, 1994; Tobias & Everson, 2000, 2002).”