The emotional impact of learning in small groups: highlighting the impact on student progression and retention
By Patricia Cartney, A. Rouse. 2006
125 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fd40bc4fe15691d95b6d0ca7d93a983fb5f0e64d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- Jennie L. Jones
- Sema A. Kalaian
- Rafa M. Kasim
- Krista M. Soria
- Michael J. Stebleton
- R. Masika
- Patricia Cartney
- Yueting Xu
Citations in the corpus
- A Meta-Analytic Review of Studies of the Effectiveness of Small-Group Learning Methods on Statistics Achievement (2014, background): “…and active student-centered instructional methods that empower the learners in small groups to work collaboratively and cooperatively with other members of the group in a teambased environment using effective communication and social skills (Cartney 2006; Fink 2004; Springer, et al. 1999).”
- Building student belonging and engagement: insights into higher education students’ experiences of participating and learning together (2016, background): “…and more diverse student body in the context of widening participation has focused minds on developing approaches to student retention and success (Cartney and Rouse 2006; Rowley 2003; Testa and Egan 2014; Yorke and Longden 2004) as has concern over risks and financial costs to students and…”
- Exploring the use of peer assessment as a vehicle for closing the gap between feedback given and feedback used (2010, result): “These findings support earlier research suggesting that for peer assessment to work most effectively, tutors need to have an awareness of the potential emotional as well as cognitive aspects of group learning (Cartney and Rouse 2006).”
- First-generation students' academic engagement and retention (2012, background): “There are several steps that faculty can take to enhance students' sense of belonging on campus; for example, first-generation students may benefit from having access to communities of belonging (Cartney and Rouse 2006 ; Parks 2000 ; Strange 2001 ), which may take the form of targeted initiativ”
- Individual differences in negative group work experiences in collaborative student learning (2008, background): “Cartney and Rouse (2006) have argued that small group work may serve to improve the social and academic integration of students, and thus improve retention.”