Teaching the control-of-variables strategy: A meta-analysis

By Martin Schwichow, Steve Croker, Corinne Zimmerman, Tim N. Höffler, Hendrik Härtig. 2016

148 citations recorded by the source corpus.

A core component of scientific inquiry is the ability to evaluate evidence generated from controlled experiments and then to relate that evidence to a hypothesis or theory. The control-of-variables strategy (CVS) is foundational for school science and scientific literacy, but it does not routinely develop without practice or instruction. This meta-analysis summarizes the findings from 72 intervention studies at least partly designed to increase students' CVS skills. By using the method of robust meta-regression for dealing with multiple effect sizes from single studies, and by excluding outliers, we estimated a mean effect size of g = 0.61 (95% CI = 0.53–0.69). Our moderator analyses focused on design features, student characteristics, instruction characteristics, and assessment features. Only two instruction characteristics – the use of cognitive conflict and the use of demonstrations – were significantly related to student achievement. Furthermore, the format of the assessment instrument was identified as a major source of variability between study outcomes. Implications for teaching and learning science process skills and future research are discussed.

Subfields: Education, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fc78344e483a3ac774a7e0557900fa3e31622b8a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

  1. Frank Fischer
  2. Ansgar Opitz
  3. Moritz Heene

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

  1. Frank Fischer
  2. Moritz Heene

In Statistics and Probability

  1. Frank Fischer

Citations in the corpus