The validity of verbal reports in children's subtraction
By K. M. Robinson. 2001
112 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fb61568d99a47f542ca169cdb9135cf1b4988950
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- James E. Corter
- Doris Zahner
- R. Leow
- Robert S. Siegler
- Melissa A. Bowles
- R. Beghetto
- James C. Kaufman
- S. Montrul
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
In Statistics and Probability
- James E. Corter
- Doris Zahner
- R. Leow
- Robert S. Siegler
- Melissa A. Bowles
- R. Beghetto
- Rafael E. Núñez
- Geetha B. Ramani
Citations in the corpus
- Microgenetic Analyses of Learning (2007, background): “Since the publication of Ericsson’s and Simon’s seminal book, a great deal of evidence has supported their conclusion (Crutcher, 1994; Robinson, 2001; Siegler, 1987; 1989).”
- REACTIVITY AND TYPE OF VERBAL REPORT IN SLA RESEARCH METHODOLOGY: Expanding the Scope of Investigation (2005, background): “…or aptitudes differ, with some patterns facilitating and others inhibiting learning and performance under certain conditions, or on certain tasks ~P+ Robinson, 2001!, it stands to reason that abilities and aptitudes might also affect verbalization under different conditions and on different…”
- Children's Learning (2009, unknown): “4”
- The Process of Probability Problem Solving: Use of External Visual Representations (2010, background): “However, several decades of research has supported the validity of data from think-aloud protocols in investigating mathematics problem solving, even with elementary school students (e.g., Ericsson & Simon, 1993; Robinson, 2001).”