The Bases of Power and the Power/Interaction Model of Interpersonal Influence

By B. Raven. 2008

419 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fafd898fb53cc2044831c9a23b164a39df9fd23a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

When Hierarchy Wins (2012, background): “Legitimacy, which is ‘‘the belief that authorities, institutions, and social arrangements are appropriate, proper, and just’’ (Tyler, 2006, p. 376), allows leaders and authorities to influence followers through acquiescence rather than force (Raven, 2008).”
A functional model of hierarchy (2011, background): “It does so by minimizing the need to use costly and unpopular methods of influence (i.e., coercive power; French & Raven, 1959; Raven, 2008) and by allowing leaders and power holders to appeal to followers’ values and moral norms as means to achieve high levels of voluntary cooperation and…”
Zeileis Conditional Variable Importance for Random Forests (2015, background): “Social regulation can be defined as the capability of an entity to shape others’ behavior, attitudes, or beliefs [87,88].”
Transformational Instructor-Leadership in Higher Education Teaching: A Meta-Analytic Review and Research Agenda (2016, background): “Because of an instructor’s authoritative position, level of autonomy, and resources that they command, all of Raven’s (2008) power bases can be observed in an instructor’s position.”
Integrating social power into the decision-making of cognitive agents (2016, methodology): “Another of the most influential [9,28,34,35] and highly regarded bodies of research on social power is the work of French and Raven [37,68], which is representative of the modeling of social power in terms of the Potential for Influence.”