What Moderates the Too-Much-Choice Effect?

By Benjamin Scheibehenne, Rainer Greifeneder, Peter M. Todd. 2009

192 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, General Decision Sciences, Marketing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f998387c59cb6945e425fc14e07868620092e6ed

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Ulf Böckenholt
2. A. Chernev
3. J. Goodman
4. Peter M. Todd
5. Rainer Greifeneder
6. Benjamin Scheibehenne

In General Decision Sciences

1. Ulf Böckenholt
2. J. Goodman
3. A. Chernev
4. Benjamin Scheibehenne
5. Rainer Greifeneder
6. Peter M. Todd
7. Gerd Gigerenzer
8. Jonas Schmidt

In Marketing

1. Ulf Böckenholt
2. J. Goodman
3. A. Chernev
4. Rainer Greifeneder
5. Benjamin Scheibehenne
6. Peter M. Todd

Citations in the corpus

• Choice overload: A conceptual review and meta-analysis (2015, methodology): “In their meta-analysis, Scheibehenne et al. (2010) report 63 observations from 50 published and unpublished experiments (N = 5036) conducted in the fields of psychology and marketing. The data used in our meta-analysis are different in several respects. First, our dataset is significantly larger, in”
• Can There Ever Be Too Many Options? A Meta-Analytic Review of Choice Overload (2010, methodology): “This is also in line with the results of Scheibehenne et al. (2009), who directly tested and did not find cultural differences in choice overload between Germany and the United States by conducting closely matched experiments in both countries.”