Choice overload: A conceptual review and meta-analysis

By A. Chernev, Ulf Böckenholt, J. Goodman. 2015

760 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/48a0eba4bb1df2c391844aae409873942275ba09

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Economics and Econometrics

In General Decision Sciences

Citations in the corpus

When and why defaults influence decisions: a meta-analysis of default effects (2019, methodology): “By using these three levels, we can take into account that observations derived from the same study or article are likely to be more similar than observations from different studies or articles (Rosenthal, 1995; Thompson & Higgins, 2002; Sánchez-Meca et al., 2003; Chernev et al., 2012).”
Consumers and their behavior: state of the art in behavioral science supporting use phase modeling in LCA and ecodesign (2016, background): “Complex choices can lead to information overload and ultimately demotivation (Bchoice overload^, (Chernev et al. 2015).”
Profit-maximizing parcel locker location problem under threshold Luce model (2020, background): “This phenomenon reflects the paradox of choice or choice overload effect (Chernev et al., 2015).”
Mobile shopping cart abandonment: The roles of conflicts, ambivalence, and hesitation (2018, neutral): “A large assortment size leads to choice overload, which decreases decision confidence and satisfaction (Chernev, Böckenholt, & Goodman, 2015), while a lack of choices relates to power deprivation (Inesi, Botti, Dubois, Rucker, & Galinsky, 2011).”
On the meaning and measurement of maximization (2016, neutral): “Yet having many choices can also be overwhelming, leading to choice paralysis (i.e., failure to make any choice; Iyengar & Lepper, 2000), and increasing regret, dissatisfaction, and unhappiness (e.g., Chernev et al., 2015; Schwartz, 2000, 2004).”
Consumers and Artificial Intelligence: An Experiential Perspective (2020, neutral): “…related to the way in which options are presented—the choice architec-ture—can reduce the cognitive and affective costs associated with excessive information and choice (Chernev, Bo¨ckenholt, and Goodman 2015) and thereby give consumers greater con-trol over their data without overloading them.”
Re-examining the Experiential Advantage in Consumption: A Meta-Analysis and Review (2020, background): “For instance, meta-analyses have examined how materialism relates to happiness (Dittmar et al. 2014), how considering (e.g., number of options; Chernev, Bo¨ckenholt, and Goodman 2015) has an influence on outcomes such as satisfaction, and the linkages between happiness and other outcomes…”